Wow. A petition to remove their school principal. source : http://zenith20.blogspot.com/2006/09/petition.html

1. Definitions

1.1 Within this document, Mr Lee Hak Boon shall be known as ‘the Principal’ or ‘Mr Lee’ unless otherwise stated.

1.2 Catholic High School (Secondary) shall be known as ‘School’ within this document.

1.3 The term ‘We’, and ‘Us’ is a collective term to represent the students, parents of the students, the School Alumni, and teachers of the School.

1.4 “Students” would refer to Students of Catholic High School.

1.5 “Student Leaders” or “SL(s)” means the Student Leaders Board members comprising of Student Councillors, Prefects, and the Class Management Committee.

1.6 “Prefects” would be students appointed by the school who carry school badges with a black strip with the word “Prefect”, and wear the school tie in school at all times when in full school uniform. Their task is to deal with discipline problems in the school by being part of a collective force to apprehend students in breach of them. They are part of the Prefectorial Board, which is part of the Student Leaders Board.

1.7 ‘Student Councillors’ refer to students appointed by the school to deal with affairs including, but not limited to, preparation of school activities and events, coordination of school programmes.

1.8 “Class Management Committee” refers to students who are or were Class Chairmen or Assistant Class Chairmen of their respective classes in school.

1.9 “Class Chairman” and “Assistant Class Chairman” refer to the Class Monitor and Vice-Monitor respectively.

2. State of Request

2.1. We ask that Mr Lee resign with immediate effect.

2.1.1. This is to take place and the Vice-Principal of the Primary School shall take over, either temporarily or permanently.

2.2. We request that Mr Lee to take no further part of School Activities

2.2.1. This includes, but is not limited to:

2.2.1.1. Preparation of events:

2.2.1.1.1. Children’s Day
2.2.1.1.2. Teacher’s Day
2.2.1.1.3. Youth Day
2.2.1.1.4. Racial Harmony Day
2.2.1.1.5. Chinese New Year
2.2.1.2. Catholic High Sports Night
2.2.1.3. Catholic High Annual Cross-Country

2.3. We ask that he present a formal apology to us on basis explained in: (Point 3)

2.4. The use of funds in the upgrading of the school library.

2.4.1. The buying of new books and learning resources

2.4.2. The buying of new storybooks and texts

2.5. The use of funds to get better teaching resources.

2.5.1. Relevant studies and books on subject matter

2.6. The keeping of teachers as follows, unless by choice, the tendering of resignation:
2.6.1. Mrs Alice Long
2.6.2. Mrs Melissa Neo
2.6.3. Mrs Chung Lee Siang
2.6.4. Mrs Anna Tan
2.6.5. Mr Jeffrey Goh
2.6.6. Ms Thian Wan Eng
2.6.7. Ms Leong Se Yean
2.6.8. Mr Yong Kwang Hei
2.6.9. Mr Goh Yong Han
2.6.9.1. This list is not exhaustive.

3. Reasons of Request

3.1. Mr Lee has requested the building of ponds and with due thanks to donations has made them possible. This has been detrimental to the school in the following ways:

3.1.1. These ponds are:

3.1.1.1. Pond at Car Porch in the Secondary School.
3.1.1.2. Pond outside Science Laboratories
3.1.1.3. Pond in the Primary School Premises.

3.1.2. Request for such funds to build ponds was unnecessary. This has diverted funds which could be used in better ways (Point 4).

3.1.3. High maintenance and electrical bill
3.1.4. Poor maintenance of the ponds.
3.1.5. No immediate and tangible benefits of the pond

3.2. Mr Lee has bought statues and stones or requested the donation of these them. They have had no benefit and had been detrimental.

3.2.1. The statues in question:

3.2.1.1. Statue of Eagle at Car Porch of Secondary School.
3.2.1.2. Various stones along sloping path upwards from Secondary School Car Porch to General Office.
3.2.1.3. Statue of ‘Fire’ at Plaza and the bronze statues at the Secondary School General Office car porch running to it.
3.2.1.4. 2 Statues of Lions at mini-river outside rooms of NPCC, St John’s Ambulance Brigade and NCC (Air)
3.2.1.5. Statue of hands outside of the Primary School General Office

3.2.2. Monies used to buy and maintain these statues could be diverted to other funds.

3.2.3. They have no tangible benefit for the students.

3.3. Mr Lee has scolded teachers for the high electricity bill.

3.3.1. To quote a teacher who has spoken on condition of anonymity, “That time, he complained to us that the electricity bill was high because we were staying in school and marking worksheets past 6 pm.”

3.3.2. This shows contempt for the teachers as the a school, as, to quote several Dictionaries,

3.3.2.1. Oxford Dictionary of English: “an institution for educating children.”
3.3.2.2. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary: “a place where children are taught”
3.3.2.3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary: “an institution for the teaching of children”

3.3.3. He has placed the fundamental reason for a school, a place for students to learn, below that of monetary assets. This clearly shows what he valuates. He puts the cost of electricity above student welfare.

3.3.4. According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, after physiological needs, Safety needs need to be met, and under one of them, called the ‘Security of Employment’, is where education lies. A good education is essential to have a good, well paying job in future. Having a good job, especially one where students in future will have would mean that they would have ‘Security of Employment’. Having teachers who are unable to do their job to the best of their ability not only threatens to tarnish their ‘Security of Employment’, also threatens students’ own ‘Security of Employment’. This is of equal importance of ‘Security of revenues and resources’, however because this money comes from the government, and with coffers amounting to millions, what we see is that Mr Lee is placing an insignificant portion of money over the needs of students.

3.4. He is of unreasonable character

3.4.1. He demands a utopia of having zero latecomers.

3.4.1.1. This is very, very hard to fulfill, considering this idea of Chaos Theory, where there is always an unforeseen circumstance which can disrupt daily life, thanks to a chain of events, of which a student would not be involved in, until he gets affected negatively by being late.

3.4.1.2. He draws a comparison of being late for school to going to Changi Airport to take a plane to London at 5 am. He tells the students that they would not be late for the plane to London, but would be late school.

3.4.1.2.1. This comparison is ridiculous considering the circumstance surrounding each event. To go to school is almost a daily affair, and monotonous and is further worsened by the fact that the students lack the motivation to go to school due to what they perceive as poor leadership.

3.4.1.2.2. If any student were to London, even at any absurd time, they would be on time, there would be a sense of excitement and anxiousness. This is especially so because a plane ticket is high in cost, especially that of a ticket to Western Europe.

3.4.1.3. He caused the breaking down of a teacher in public, where when he scolded the students of Class 3-9 of 2006 for being late. Mrs Alice Long, as form teacher, defended them, and Mr Lee then blamed Mrs Long for being irresponsible and letting her students to be late. The students then told Mr Lee that it was not the fault of Mrs Long, and that they were fully to blame. He then scolded both Mrs Long, who was totally innocent, and the late students. This trauma of being scolded on absolutely no basis has made her break down.

3.4.1.3.1. Mrs Alice Long’s record as a teacher has been excellent, and has been constantly producing As in the ‘O’ Levels, and is very well respected by the students.

3.4.2. He has threatened to expel students due to a lack of punctuality.

3.4.2.1. This occurred on 14th July, 2006, during morning assembly in the Plaza. Mr Lee threatened to expel students who were late for assembly. This is unprecedented, and has no historical precedence. This is also not a rule in schools all around Singapore, and in other parts of the first world.

3.4.2.2. This harsh reality brought forward is unforgiving, where for a minute offence, a student may be expelled. This message is negative and is of resemblance to a totalitarian state.

3.5. Intentional demoralisation of the students.

3.5.1. As an educator, he knows that making harsh comments at students would result in a demoralization, which would lead to underperformance.

3.5.1.1. During the collection of the ‘O’ Level Results of 2005, to those whom came late, he called them ‘insolent brats’. This is a direct attack on a person’s morals. As an educator, he should not have done so.

3.5.1.2. During talks with the Secondary 4s of 2006, he ridiculed and insulted them for doing poorly in the ‘O’ Levels. He lashed out at many people which the Secondary 4s of 2006 respected, their direct seniors, of whom they have very good relationships with.

3.5.1.3. He has called latecomers to school ‘useless’ and ‘stupid’. These words, coming from someone whom they should respect are harsh, critical, and unforgiving. It creates a negative sentiment among the students and can affect results. This is not helpful to the school environment.

3.6. Collection of monies without proper accountability

3.6.1. He gives red packets to students during Chinese New Year, demanding that students donate money to the school. If one were to not pay up, they were to face disciplinary action.

3.6.2. The money has never been accounted for by Mr Lee, and the claim of the use of this money is the building of the school and for the funds for CCAs.

3.6.3. Money has never reached the coffers of certain CCAs which have not been performing well.

3.6.3.1. Money has been unfairly distributed where CCAs with better track records get more money. This creates a rich-poor divide between the good and the weak CCAs.

3.6.3.2. Poorer CCAs, with less funds, are unable to purchase better resources and exploit the full potential of the students. This is very detrimental to the students, as they would be unable to:

3.6.3.2.1. Maximise their full potential
3.6.3.2.2. Earn CCA Points
3.6.3.2.3. Get exposure

3.6.3.3. 2 students, during the Chinese New Year of 2005, did not adhere to the school’s demands, and were brought out for disciplinary action because they did not donate to the school

3.6.3.3.1. To donate is an act of charity, stemmed from the Latin word, charitas.

3.6.3.3.2. Charitas essentially means ‘to give’, and when a person gives, without any connotations, it can be said that he or she would give on his or her own free will.

3.6.3.3.3. This is an act of extortion, and is illegal under the Penal Code (Chapter 224), Chapter XVII, 383.

3.6.3.3.4. This form of injury is in the form of disciplinary action, which can result in caning, or worse.

3.7. Lack of standardisation and discipline

3.7.1. During the course of the 4 years Mr Lee has been here, punishment for offences has been wide-ranging and varying.

3.7.1.1. Penalty for the smuggling food out of canteen:

3.7.1.1.1. There has never been a standard punishment for those caught smuggling food outside of the canteen during recess.

3.7.1.1.2. Prefects on duty have shown lack of focus on the job. They allow people blatantly eating food out of the canteen, and only request them to go back to the canteen. When they do not do so, they do not take any action.

3.7.1.2. There is no check in the Student Lounge to disallow the smuggling of food to class.

3.7.1.2.1. This is unlike the policy of the prohibition of the removal of food from the canteen during recess. Both areas are places which students go to during recess for meals or food.

3.7.1.2.2. It is a double-standard, where one has a check-and-balance, albeit weak, while the other does not altogether.

3.7.1.3. Ankle socks are prohibited without reason in the school, yet the school is lax in the apprehension of students who do not follow this rule.

3.7.1.3.1. Student leaders have pressed for the lifting on the prohibition of ankle-length socks, however, there is no official reason as to the ban of it.

3.7.1.3.2. Students caught have multiple punishments, without a standard process of defining what punishment for when.

3.7.1.4. The consumption of food is banned in classrooms

3.7.1.4.1. This rule is not enforced within the school, and is, like the previous 2 rules, (3.7.1.1. and 3.7.1.3), tokenistic in nature.

3.7.1.4.2. The Class Chairman does not take action when this rule is broken. Student leaders are also sometimes guilty of breaking this rule.

3.7.1.5. The students are not allowed to change into the School Uniform or PE Attire in the classrooms.

3.7.1.5.1. This rule is tokenistic in nature, as there are students who change within the classroom.

3.7.1.5.2. Even against the urges of the Student Leaders, this continues.

3.7.2. Latecomers to school have never had a proper punishment.

3.7.2.1. For one, they had to sleep on the sick bay bed for a certain period of time, before they were let off to class.

3.7.2.2. That was scrapped and students were forced to walk around the school with a sign, and using a loudhailer, saying, “Let me not be the one who is late”.

3.7.2.3. It was then changed to have students being forced to stand in front of the school in morning assembly in the next day.

3.7.2.4. This lack of proper punishment systems does not help the school.

3.7.3. The moderation of the Preliminary results of the Secondary 4 batch of 2005.

3.7.3.1. Mr Lee demanded the moderation of the Prelim papers to such an extent that the Prelims were a farce.

3.7.3.2. A student with 15 points in the Prelims was allowed to enter Hwa Chong Junior College.

3.7.3.3. He refused to listen to the opinions of the other teachers and accused them of having ‘no team spirit’, and inducing ‘negative sentiment’.

3.7.4. The safety hazards within the school

3.7.4.1. As Principal, his primary concern should be the welfare of the students, and this has not been the case. He has allowed the following:

3.7.4.1.1. Inadequacy of fire extinguishers
3.7.4.1.2. Available fire extinguishers are empty
3.7.4.1.3. Usage of hose reel area for storage
3.7.4.1.4. Lack of medical equipment in first-aid kits



Sincerely,
Ho Wee Seng, Class 3-6, 2006.
And,
The undersigned.


Wow its very professional if u ask me. Its almost as if its written by a lawyer. Some of the comments left by ex chs ppl are really interesting @@.

The teacher referred in the post left a comment(nt sure whether its true)
"Dear all,

This is Mrs Alice Long. I feel compelled to write after reading this blog and would like to urge all involved to put this matter to rest. This petition had earlier been removed by Wee Seng. He and his father have since apologised to the school over this incident. I can assure those who are concerned that I was never asked to leave Catholic High. Once again, I appeal to all to put this matter to rest instead let's channel our energy and effort towards building a great Catholic High.

Mrs Alice Long"

And another teacher

"Dear all

This is mr tan ping hock, a physics teacher from catholic high. I would like to urge all involved to stop exploiting the situation as wee seng has already withdrawn his petition, clarified that there is no truth and apologised to the school.
I agree with mrs long that we all should channel our energy and effort towards greater achievements for catholic high.

Mr Tan Ping Hock"

Some other comments:
"It's also true that Mrs Long was not asked to leave, but the Principal did insult her indirectly in front of her students by saying "if Mrs Long has cared about you, you won't be like this". Another well-respected senior Physics teacher was given a note and asked to leave instead."

"indeed, this petition happened some time ago alr. it did stir up quite a disturbance in the school itself. but since then, the principal had alr tried to change the situation by opening up platforms for feedbacks. and mr lee himself had repeatedly told us that many things mentioned in the petition is not true. for example the channeling of school funds for the wrong usuage. he even went to the extent of proving to us that the whole petition was made up, in this case by asking the donars themselves to come clarify the matter with us."

"We, the Anglican High students, are glad to claim that we respect our school, the teachers and even our classmates and friends, of course not forgetting the seniors and juniors. We unite together and contribute to the school, we don't speak bad about our school, instead we try our best to show to the public how civilised and polite AHS students are. "

lol what the hell does ahs has got to do with this thing?

"During my time in Xinmin, latecomers were publicly humilated by being forced to walk around the whole school building, wearing a card board sign, and repeating on a loud hailer the phrase :"Let me not be the one who is late" (apparently, Mr Lee has since re-used this technique in CHS).And what was the motive of having zero late comers? To help students become more disciplined and responsible?
NO!! in my opinion, it was done all for his Zero Late comers Day record. To quote the man himself :"When i tell other principals that Xinmin Secondary School has 50 days of no latecomers, they all go: WOW!!! how did you do it?""

Its this punishment that'll bring out the bad side of them instead of removing it.

"To (ALL)

as a current secondary three student in catholic high- i can safely assure that much of the things written in the pertition are untruths or exaggerations and that too much has been taken into account over this matter. "

"My batch had seriously underperformed in the O Levels, resulting in CHS dropping to Band 3 from the previous years Band 1. Mr Lee, our beloved principal, thus lost "face". ONe of my fellow schoolmates, who had done very well in the prelims but somehow screwed up his English for O Levels went to Mr Lee to ask for a letter of reccomndation so that he could reenter the JC of his choice. He was also outstanding in his CCA, in addition to being the President of the Students Council. Mr Lee rejected him straight in the face, with a scathing remark "I don't give recommendation letters to Band 3 students." This hurtful comment could have severely dented the pride and self confidence of a student which CHS "groomed" in character building. Says something doesn't it?"

Ouch.

I admire that guy who submitted this petition using his REAL NAME, he must have some gigantic balls. Then again , according to them , most of the thing propose is inaccurate. Just food for thoughts ^^. Swimming pool, locked up tennis court, sucky canteen food. *wink* do i smell any brave marist?:P